Wei ZW, Liu XD, Li DY, Cheng WL, Fu YP, Yang D. Anxiety and depression symptoms correlate with metabolic indicators in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease patients. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(8): 117628 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i8.117628]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
1.Evaluation of journal credibility: This journal maintains high academic credibility with standardized publishing workflows and rigorous management norms.
2.Evaluation of journal peer review: The peer review process is fair, transparent and efficient. Reviewers put forward targeted, constructive comments which greatly helped improve the quality of my manuscript.
3.Publication comments: The whole publication process went smoothly. I appreciate the dedicated work of editorial assistants, editors, peer reviewers, editorial directors, editor-in-chief, language editors and production editors. All communications were timely and professional. I am satisfied with the overall service experience and would consider submitting manuscripts to this journal again in the future.